Harley-davidson Dyna Low Rider vs Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Dyna Low Rider
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
Horsepower (hp)
67 hp
68 hp
Torque (Nm)
130 Nm
112 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
307 kg
305 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
67 hp @ 5,500 rpm (2014 103ci Twin Cam; earlier models may differ)
68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (note: estimated for 96ci Twin Cam; 103ci variant approx. 73 hp)
Torque
130 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (2014 103ci Twin Cam; estimated for representative model year)
112 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96; 103ci approx. 119 Nm)
Top Speed
175 km/h (estimated; note: varies by year and engine displacement)
185 km/h
Weight
307 kg (wet/curb weight, approximate for 2014 FXDL)
305 kg (wet/curb weight, 2008-2017 Dyna FXDF)
Fuel
6.0 L/100km (approx. 16.7 km/L, typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L, real-world average for 2008-2017 Dyna Fat Bob)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Dyna Low Rider
7.5/10
"A genuinely capable cruiser if you buy the right one."
Pros
+Excellent low seat height
+103ci torque is addictive
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Primary chain tensioner issues
−Amateur custom work epidemic
−Vibration fatigues on long hauls
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
7.8/10
"Raw, honest American muscle that rewards careful used-buying diligence."
Pros
+Bulletproof Twin Cam reliability
+Genuinely aggressive visual presence
+Responsive handling for its class
Cons
−Cam tensioners need early inspection
−Rear isolator mounts crack silently
−Motorway cruising vibration tiring
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
