Energica Eva Ribelle Rs vs Kawasaki Z900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Energica Eva Ribelle Rs vs Kawasaki Z900. Energica Eva Ribelle Rs: 107 hp (80 kW) continuous / ~145 hp (108 kW) peak hp, 260 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 200 km/h (electronically limited), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Kawasaki Z900: 125 hp @ 9,500 rpm hp, 214 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Energica Eva Ribelle Rs
Kawasaki Z900
Horsepower (hp)
107 hp
125 hp
Torque (Nm)
215 Nm
98.6 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
200 km/h
225 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
260 kg
214 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
107 hp (80 kW) continuous / ~145 hp (108 kW) peak
125 hp @ 9,500 rpm
Torque
215 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant, from standstill)
98.6 Nm @ 7,700 rpm
Top Speed
200 km/h (electronically limited)
225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced)
Weight
260 kg (curb weight)
214 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
N/A – Electric. Estimated ~6-8 kWh/100km real-world energy consumption; range approximately 150-200 km (city) / 100-130 km (highway)
5.5–6.5 L/100km (approx. 15–18 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Energica Eva Ribelle Rs
7.5/10
"A genuinely exciting electric naked if range anxiety doesn't terrify you."
Pros
+Ohlins suspension genuinely excellent
+DC fast charging capable
+Savage, linear torque delivery
Cons
−Real-world range disappoints
−Battery replacement costs frightening
−Charging network still patchy
Kawasaki Z900
8.5/10
"The used streetfighter benchmark that rivals struggle to beat at this money."
Pros
+Fantastic power-to-price ratio
+Chassis feedback genuinely excellent
+Parts and servicing affordable
Cons
−Pre-2020 forks underwhelming
−Vibes above 8,000rpm noticeable
−Wind protection essentially nonexistent
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
