Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Ktm 690 Smc R
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Ktm 690 Smc R. Ccm Flat Tracker 450: ~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Ktm 690 Smc R: 74 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 148 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
Ktm 690 Smc R
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
74 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
73 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
148 kg
Type
Supermoto
Supermoto
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine)
74 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~40 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
73 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
~175 km/h
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
148 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated typical real-world average)
4.5–5.5 L/100km (approx. 18–22 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
8.0/10
"A thrilling boutique tracker that demands an attentive, committed owner."
Pros
+Genuinely exotic British provenance
+Suspension properly sorted from factory
+Lightweight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Parts sourcing occasionally frustrating
−Aggressive power needs respect
−Subframe cracks on abused examples
Ktm 690 Smc R
8.0/10
"An absolute weapon that rewards diligent buyers and destroys lazy ones."
Pros
+Insane fun-per-dollar ratio
+Lightweight and incredibly flickable
+Strong torquey single engine
Cons
−Maintenance-hungry, punishes neglect hard
−Crash damage risk very high
−Vibrations fatigue on long hauls
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
