Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Husqvarna 701 Motard
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Husqvarna 701 Motard. Ccm Flat Tracker 450: ~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Husqvarna 701 Motard: 74 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 153 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~195 km/h (estimated; governed by aerodynamics of single-cylinder output), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
Husqvarna 701 Motard
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
74 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
73 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
195 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
153 kg
Type
Supermoto
Supermoto
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine)
74 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~40 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
73 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
~195 km/h (estimated; governed by aerodynamics of single-cylinder output)
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
153 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated typical real-world average)
4.5–5.5 L/100km (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
8.0/10
"A thrilling boutique tracker that demands an attentive, committed owner."
Pros
+Genuinely exotic British provenance
+Suspension properly sorted from factory
+Lightweight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Parts sourcing occasionally frustrating
−Aggressive power needs respect
−Subframe cracks on abused examples
Husqvarna 701 Motard
8.5/10
"The best fun-per-pound supermoto you can buy used today."
Pros
+Savage, addictive single-cylinder engine
+Lightweight and brilliantly flickable
+Excellent WP suspension
Cons
−Significant vibration at highway speeds
−Valve service frequently neglected
−Subframe cracking issues known
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
