Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Cfmoto Cl-x 700 Sport
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Cfmoto Cl-x 700 Sport. Ccm Flat Tracker 450: ~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Cfmoto Cl-x 700 Sport: 70 hp @ 8,750 rpm hp, 213 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
Cfmoto Cl-x 700 Sport
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
70 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
62 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
213 kg
Type
Supermoto
Supermoto
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine)
70 hp @ 8,750 rpm
Torque
~40 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
62 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
175 km/h (estimated)
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
213 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated typical real-world average)
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L, estimated real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
8.0/10
"A thrilling boutique tracker that demands an attentive, committed owner."
Pros
+Genuinely exotic British provenance
+Suspension properly sorted from factory
+Lightweight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Parts sourcing occasionally frustrating
−Aggressive power needs respect
−Subframe cracks on abused examples
Cfmoto Cl-x 700 Sport
7.5/10
"Punches well above its price tag if you do the legwork."
Pros
+Strong, usable midrange torque
+Sharp retro-sport styling
+Excellent used value proposition
Cons
−Patchy parts availability regionally
−Thin dealer network nationwide
−Early gearboxes occasionally notchy
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
