Can-am Ryker 900 vs Suzuki Burgman 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Can-am Ryker 900
Suzuki Burgman 400
Horsepower (hp)
82 hp
31 hp
Torque (Nm)
85 Nm
38 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
155 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
296 kg
222 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
82 hp @ 7,500 rpm
31 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
85 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
38 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
175 km/h (estimated; note: BRP does not officially publish a top speed figure)
155 km/h
Weight
296 kg (curb weight)
222 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Can-am Ryker 900
7.5/10
"Solid used buy if you know exactly what it is."
Pros
+Rotax twin pulls strong
+CVT nearly maintenance-free
+Tilting front end surprises
Cons
−Wide footprint limits lane filtering
−Bodywork replacement costs sting
−Not a real motorcycle
Suzuki Burgman 400
7.8/10
"The sensible scooter that actually delivers on every promise."
Pros
+Bulletproof engine longevity
+Massive underseat storage capacity
+Confident highway stability
Cons
−CVT belt needs regular attention
−Front brakes underwhelm hard stops
−Plastics scratch and crack easily