Can-am Ryker 600 vs Suzuki Burgman 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Can-am Ryker 600 vs Suzuki Burgman 400. Can-am Ryker 600: 50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, 294 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 400: 31 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 222 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 155 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Can-am Ryker 600
Suzuki Burgman 400
Horsepower (hp)
50 hp
31 hp
Torque (Nm)
54 Nm
38 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
155 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
294 kg
222 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
31 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
54 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
38 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
145 km/h (estimated)
155 km/h
Weight
294 kg (curb weight)
222 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Can-am Ryker 600
7.0/10
"A genuinely capable machine, but buy it for what it is."
Pros
+Nearly impossible to tip over
+Rotax triple pulls strong
+Parts and service widely available
Cons
−CVT kills engagement completely
−Steering learning curve is real
−Belt wear gets expensive fast
Suzuki Burgman 400
7.8/10
"The sensible scooter that actually delivers on every promise."
Pros
+Bulletproof engine longevity
+Massive underseat storage capacity
+Confident highway stability
Cons
−CVT belt needs regular attention
−Front brakes underwhelm hard stops
−Plastics scratch and crack easily
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
