Can-am Ryker 600 vs Suzuki Burgman 200
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Can-am Ryker 600 vs Suzuki Burgman 200. Can-am Ryker 600: 50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, 294 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Burgman 200: 18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 161 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions), Motoryk rating 7.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Can-am Ryker 600
Suzuki Burgman 200
Horsepower (hp)
50 hp
18.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
54 Nm
16 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
294 kg
161 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
18.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
54 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
16 Nm @ 6,000 rpm
Top Speed
145 km/h (estimated)
130 km/h (estimated; note: may vary by region and conditions)
Weight
294 kg (curb weight)
161 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Can-am Ryker 600
7.0/10
"A genuinely capable machine, but buy it for what it is."
Pros
+Nearly impossible to tip over
+Rotax triple pulls strong
+Parts and service widely available
Cons
−CVT kills engagement completely
−Steering learning curve is real
−Belt wear gets expensive fast
Suzuki Burgman 200
7.2/10
"A sensible, honest commuter that rewards patient, practical riders."
Pros
+Exceptional real-world fuel economy
+Massive underseat storage
+Reliable, low-maintenance drivetrain
Cons
−Highway speeds feel strained
−Plastic bodywork cracks easily
−Variator wear often neglected
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
