Bmw K 1300 R vs Kawasaki Z900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Bmw K 1300 R vs Kawasaki Z900. Bmw K 1300 R: 173 hp @ 9,250 rpm hp, 228 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 249 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.2/10. Kawasaki Z900: 125 hp @ 9,500 rpm hp, 214 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Bmw K 1300 R
Kawasaki Z900
Horsepower (hp)
173 hp
125 hp
Torque (Nm)
140 Nm
98.6 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
249 km/h
225 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
228 kg
214 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
173 hp @ 9,250 rpm
125 hp @ 9,500 rpm
Torque
140 Nm @ 8,000 rpm
98.6 Nm @ 7,700 rpm
Top Speed
249 km/h
225 km/h (estimated; electronically influenced)
Weight
228 kg (wet/curb weight)
214 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
6.5–7.5 L/100km (typical real-world average)
5.5–6.5 L/100km (approx. 15–18 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Bmw K 1300 R
8.2/10
"A flawed masterpiece that rewards experienced riders who budget honestly."
Pros
+Savage, addictive power delivery
+Surprisingly comfortable long-distance
+Rock-solid build quality
Cons
−Expensive dealer servicing costs
−Heavy, awkward low-speed
−ESA suspension failures common
Kawasaki Z900
8.5/10
"The used streetfighter benchmark that rivals struggle to beat at this money."
Pros
+Fantastic power-to-price ratio
+Chassis feedback genuinely excellent
+Parts and servicing affordable
Cons
−Pre-2020 forks underwhelming
−Vibes above 8,000rpm noticeable
−Wind protection essentially nonexistent
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
