Ather Rizta vs Suzuki Burgman 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ather Rizta vs Suzuki Burgman 650. Ather Rizta: ~6 hp (4.5 kW peak motor output — note: official peak figures not fully published at time of knowledge cutoff) hp, ~118 kg (curb weight — note: best estimate; official figures may vary slightly by variant) weight, top speed ~80 km/h (estimated, Warp mode), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Suzuki Burgman 650: 56 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 261 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ather Rizta
Suzuki Burgman 650
Horsepower (hp)
6 hp
56 hp
Torque (Nm)
26 Nm
61 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
80 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
261 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~6 hp (4.5 kW peak motor output — note: official peak figures not fully published at time of knowledge cutoff)
56 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~26 Nm (peak, estimated based on Ather platform data)
61 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
~80 km/h (estimated, Warp mode)
175 km/h
Weight
~118 kg (curb weight — note: best estimate; official figures may vary slightly by variant)
261 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
N/A (electric) — estimated real-world range: 80–105 km per charge (varies by battery variant: 2.9 kWh or 3.7 kWh)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Ather Rizta
7.5/10
"Smart family scooter if the battery checks out clean."
Pros
+Generous underseat storage space
+OTA updates still delivered
+Comfortable ergonomics for commuting
Cons
−Battery health needs close inspection
−Warranty transfer can be complex
−Riding dynamics are unremarkable
Suzuki Burgman 650
8.0/10
"The maxi-scooter that serious riders actually respect."
Pros
+Effortless automatic transmission
+Massive underfloor storage
+Strong real-world fuel economy
Cons
−Heavy, punishing to drop
−CVT belt replacement costly
−Aging windscreen mechanisms fail
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
