Zero Fxs vs Zero Fx
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Zero Fxs
Zero Fx
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
46 hp
Torque (Nm)
106 Nm
106 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
132 kg
138 kg
Type
Electric
Electric
Horsepower
46 hp (34 kW) — note: varies slightly by model year
46 hp @ peak (continuous ~27 hp) — note: electric motors do not have a traditional RPM power peak
Torque
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant torque from standstill)
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant peak torque from standstill)
Top Speed
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight
132 kg (curb weight — note: varies slightly by battery configuration and model year)
138 kg (curb weight, 7.2 kWh battery configuration)
Fuel
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.0 kWh/100km (no fuel; electric only)
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.5 L/100km (energy consumption ~80–100 Wh/km typical real-world)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Zero Fxs
7.5/10
"Urban riding reimagined, but range limitations demand honest self-assessment first."
Pros
+Savage, instant city torque
+Near-zero running costs
+Featherlight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Range is genuinely limiting
−Battery degradation risk used
−Sparse dealer/service network
Zero Fx
7.5/10
"Urban commuter perfection, but range anxiety is genuinely real."
Pros
+Savage instant torque delivery
+Featherlight supermoto handling
+Near-zero running costs
Cons
−Real range embarrassingly limited
−Battery degradation on older bikes
−Stock charging painfully slow