Zero Fxs vs Honda Em1 E
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Zero Fxs vs Honda Em1 E. Zero Fxs: 46 hp (34 kW) — note: varies slightly by model year hp, 132 kg (curb weight — note: varies slightly by battery configuration and model year) weight, top speed 137 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Honda Em1 E: 1.7 kW (2.3 hp) continuous / 1.7 kW rated output hp, 96 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 45 km/h (limited to AM licence category), Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Zero Fxs
Honda Em1 E
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
1.7 hp
Torque (Nm)
106 Nm
90 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
137 km/h
45 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
132 kg
96 kg
Type
Electric
Electric
Horsepower
46 hp (34 kW) — note: varies slightly by model year
1.7 kW (2.3 hp) continuous / 1.7 kW rated output
Torque
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant torque from standstill)
90 Nm @ 0 rpm (wheel torque, estimated; motor output torque approximately 15.9 Nm)
Top Speed
137 km/h
45 km/h (limited to AM licence category)
Weight
132 kg (curb weight — note: varies slightly by battery configuration and model year)
96 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.0 kWh/100km (no fuel; electric only)
N/A - Electric vehicle; estimated energy consumption approximately 1.5–2.0 kWh/100km (real-world estimate)
Fairing
No
Yes
Individual Reviews
Zero Fxs
7.5/10
"Urban riding reimagined, but range limitations demand honest self-assessment first."
Pros
+Savage, instant city torque
+Near-zero running costs
+Featherlight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Range is genuinely limiting
−Battery degradation risk used
−Sparse dealer/service network
Honda Em1 E
6.5/10
"Sensible urban commuter, but range limits everything beyond city boundaries."
Pros
+Honda build quality confidence
+Removable battery pack system
+Near-zero running costs
Cons
−40-mile range ceiling reality
−Battery pack replacement costs
−No fast charging capability
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
