Zero Fxe vs Zero Fx
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Zero Fxe vs Zero Fx. Zero Fxe: 46 hp (34 kW) – peak power hp, 133 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 137 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Zero Fx: 46 hp @ peak (continuous ~27 hp) — note: electric motors do not have a traditional RPM power peak hp, 138 kg (curb weight, 7.2 kWh battery configuration) weight, top speed 137 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Zero Fxe
Zero Fx
Horsepower (hp)
46 hp
46 hp
Torque (Nm)
106 Nm
106 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
133 kg
138 kg
Type
Electric
Electric
Horsepower
46 hp (34 kW) – peak power
46 hp @ peak (continuous ~27 hp) — note: electric motors do not have a traditional RPM power peak
Torque
106 Nm – available from 0 rpm
106 Nm @ 0 rpm (instant peak torque from standstill)
Top Speed
137 km/h
137 km/h
Weight
133 kg (curb weight)
138 kg (curb weight, 7.2 kWh battery configuration)
Fuel
N/A – electric; estimated ~4.5–6 kWh/100km (real-world urban use)
Equivalent to approximately 1.5–2.5 L/100km (energy consumption ~80–100 Wh/km typical real-world)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Zero Fxe
7.5/10
"A brilliant city weapon that punishes anyone expecting more."
Pros
+Savage urban torque delivery
+Minimal maintenance requirements
+Genuinely head-turning aesthetics
Cons
−Real range disappoints highway riders
−Slow stock charging frustrates daily use
−Battery replacement costs are brutal
Zero Fx
7.5/10
"Urban commuter perfection, but range anxiety is genuinely real."
Pros
+Savage instant torque delivery
+Featherlight supermoto handling
+Near-zero running costs
Cons
−Real range embarrassingly limited
−Battery degradation on older bikes
−Stock charging painfully slow
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
