Ural Ct 750 vs Yamaha Xsr155
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ural Ct 750 vs Yamaha Xsr155. Ural Ct 750: ~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output) hp, ~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Yamaha Xsr155: 19.3 hp @ 10,000 rpm hp, 134 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 130 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ural Ct 750
Yamaha Xsr155
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
19.3 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
14.7 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
218 kg
134 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output)
19.3 hp @ 10,000 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 4,000 rpm (estimated)
14.7 Nm @ 8,500 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers)
approximately 130 km/h
Weight
~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
134 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~6.5 L/100km (estimate; real-world varies significantly with riding conditions)
2.8 L/100km or approximately 35 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ural Ct 750
6.5/10
"Buy it for the lifestyle, not the motorcycle."
Pros
+Utterly unique riding experience
+Strong, loyal owner community
+2WD capability genuinely useful
Cons
−Constant mechanical attention required
−Sluggish 40hp performance
−Neglected examples are nightmares
Yamaha Xsr155
8.0/10
"Best small retro available — just buy a clean, unmolested example."
Pros
+VVA engine genuinely rewarding
+Outstanding build quality
+Bulletproof Yamaha reliability
Cons
−Cramped for taller riders
−Abused examples are common
−Suspension soft when loaded
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
