Ural Ct 750 vs Ural Patrol 750
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ural Ct 750 vs Ural Patrol 750. Ural Ct 750: ~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output) hp, ~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Ural Patrol 750: 41 hp @ 5,500 rpm hp, ~335 kg (wet/curb weight with sidecar) weight, top speed ~105 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ural Ct 750
Ural Patrol 750
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
41 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
57 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
105 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
218 kg
335 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output)
41 hp @ 5,500 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 4,000 rpm (estimated)
57 Nm @ 4,300 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers)
~105 km/h
Weight
~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
~335 kg (wet/curb weight with sidecar)
Fuel
~6.5 L/100km (estimate; real-world varies significantly with riding conditions)
Approximately 7–9 L/100km (11–14 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ural Ct 750
6.5/10
"Buy it for the lifestyle, not the motorcycle."
Pros
+Utterly unique riding experience
+Strong, loyal owner community
+2WD capability genuinely useful
Cons
−Constant mechanical attention required
−Sluggish 40hp performance
−Neglected examples are nightmares
Ural Patrol 750
6.5/10
"A rewarding machine for patient, mechanically-inclined adventure seekers only."
Pros
+Genuinely unique ownership experience
+2WD sidecar traction impressive
+Tight-knit supportive community
Cons
−Pre-2014 reliability genuinely terrible
−Specialist mechanics hard to find
−Constant maintenance schedule required
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
