Ural Ct 750 vs Triumph Speed Twin 900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ural Ct 750 vs Triumph Speed Twin 900. Ural Ct 750: ~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output) hp, ~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Triumph Speed Twin 900: 65 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 216 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ural Ct 750
Triumph Speed Twin 900
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
65 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
80 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
218 kg
216 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output)
65 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 4,000 rpm (estimated)
80 Nm @ 3,800 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers)
185 km/h (estimated)
Weight
~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
216 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~6.5 L/100km (estimate; real-world varies significantly with riding conditions)
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ural Ct 750
6.5/10
"Buy it for the lifestyle, not the motorcycle."
Pros
+Utterly unique riding experience
+Strong, loyal owner community
+2WD capability genuinely useful
Cons
−Constant mechanical attention required
−Sluggish 40hp performance
−Neglected examples are nightmares
Triumph Speed Twin 900
7.8/10
"A characterful, honest middleweight that rewards everyday riders handsomely."
Pros
+Smooth, tractable parallel twin
+Genuinely handsome classic styling
+Comfortable all-day ergonomics
Cons
−Useless stock mirrors
−Early fueling roughness issue
−Switchgear feels budget-grade
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
