Ural Ct 750 vs Moto Guzzi V7 Classic
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ural Ct 750 vs Moto Guzzi V7 Classic. Ural Ct 750: ~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output) hp, ~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Moto Guzzi V7 Classic: 48 hp @ 6,800 rpm hp, 197 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ural Ct 750
Moto Guzzi V7 Classic
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
48 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
60 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
218 kg
197 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 5,600 rpm (estimated based on typical Ural 750cc boxer engine output)
48 hp @ 6,800 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 4,000 rpm (estimated)
60 Nm @ 5,000 rpm
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated; note: Ural solo models are generally limited performers)
175 km/h
Weight
~218 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
197 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~6.5 L/100km (estimate; real-world varies significantly with riding conditions)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ural Ct 750
6.5/10
"Buy it for the lifestyle, not the motorcycle."
Pros
+Utterly unique riding experience
+Strong, loyal owner community
+2WD capability genuinely useful
Cons
−Constant mechanical attention required
−Sluggish 40hp performance
−Neglected examples are nightmares
Moto Guzzi V7 Classic
7.5/10
"Soul over speed — Italy's most honest slow motorcycle."
Pros
+Genuinely unique riding character
+Bulletproof engine longevity
+Timeless café-classic styling
Cons
−Electrical gremlins bite hard
−Notchy gearbox always
−Specialist servicing costs more
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
