Swm Silverback 400 vs Royal Enfield Scram 411
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Swm Silverback 400 vs Royal Enfield Scram 411. Swm Silverback 400: approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Royal Enfield Scram 411: 24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm hp, 185 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~130 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Swm Silverback 400
Royal Enfield Scram 411
Horsepower (hp)
35 hp
24.3 hp
Torque (Nm)
35 Nm
32 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
165 kg
185 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm
Torque
approximately 35 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
32 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
Top Speed
approximately 145 km/h (estimated)
~130 km/h
Weight
approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight)
185 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Approximately 3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Swm Silverback 400
6.5/10
"Capable niche adventurer ruined by catastrophic parts and dealer support."
Pros
+Proven Rotax-derived engine
+Capable off-road geometry
+Priced well below competitors
Cons
−Near-zero parts availability
−Negligible dealer support network
−Resale value stays low
Royal Enfield Scram 411
7.0/10
"Honest, characterful, affordable — buy it knowing its limits."
Pros
+Bulletproof 411cc engine
+Cheap, accessible spare parts
+Brilliant ergonomics for commuting
Cons
−Vibration above 70mph
−Fork seals wear quickly
−Tripper pod screen issues
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
