Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 vs Harley-davidson Forty-eight
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 vs Harley-davidson Forty-eight. Royal Enfield Shotgun 650: 47 hp @ 7,250 rpm hp, 241 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Harley-davidson Forty-eight: 60 hp @ 6,000 rpm hp, 253 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 170 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Shotgun 650
Harley-davidson Forty-eight
Horsepower (hp)
47 hp
60 hp
Torque (Nm)
52 Nm
97 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
170 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
241 kg
253 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
47 hp @ 7,250 rpm
60 hp @ 6,000 rpm
Torque
52 Nm @ 5,650 rpm
97 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
170 km/h
Weight
241 kg (wet/curb weight)
253 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (typical real-world average)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Shotgun 650
7.5/10
"Solid, characterful scrambler that rewards patient buyers willing to upgrade tyres."
Pros
+Reliable parallel twin engine
+Genuinely attractive scrambler styling
+Comfortable upright riding position
Cons
−Stock tyres are terrible
−Suspension too soft off-road
−Cramped for taller riders
Harley-davidson Forty-eight
7.5/10
"A charismatic city scramblers that demands realistic expectations about range and comfort."
Pros
+Bulletproof Sportster engine reliability
+Parts availability everywhere
+Genuinely stunning visual presence
Cons
−Tiny tank, terrible range
−Seat punishes longer rides
−Many dropped examples exist
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.





