Royal Enfield Scram 450 vs Swm Silverback 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Scram 450 vs Swm Silverback 400. Royal Enfield Scram 450: 40 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, ~196 kg (curb weight, estimated — NOTE: official curb weight not confirmed at time of knowledge cutoff) weight, top speed ~150 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Swm Silverback 400: approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Scram 450
Swm Silverback 400
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
35 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
35 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
150 km/h
145 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
196 kg
165 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
40 hp @ 8,000 rpm
approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
Torque
40 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
approximately 35 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~150 km/h (estimated)
approximately 145 km/h (estimated)
Weight
~196 kg (curb weight, estimated — NOTE: official curb weight not confirmed at time of knowledge cutoff)
approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated real-world average)
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Scram 450
7.8/10
"A characterful, capable scrambler that finally backs up the style with substance."
Pros
+Charismatic engine, real torque
+Surprisingly capable suspension setup
+Strong parts availability improving
Cons
−Switchgear quality still questionable
−Chain adjustment needs vigilance
−Resale holds value stubbornly
Swm Silverback 400
6.5/10
"Capable niche adventurer ruined by catastrophic parts and dealer support."
Pros
+Proven Rotax-derived engine
+Capable off-road geometry
+Priced well below competitors
Cons
−Near-zero parts availability
−Negligible dealer support network
−Resale value stays low
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
