Royal Enfield Re 650 Twins vs Yamaha Xsr155
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Re 650 Twins vs Yamaha Xsr155. Royal Enfield Re 650 Twins: 47 hp @ 7,250 rpm hp, 202 kg (Interceptor 650 wet/curb weight); Continental GT 650 is approximately 198 kg weight, top speed ~177 km/h (110 mph, estimated; note: real-world results vary slightly by variant and rider), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Yamaha Xsr155: 19.3 hp @ 10,000 rpm hp, 134 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 130 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Re 650 Twins
Yamaha Xsr155
Horsepower (hp)
47 hp
19.3 hp
Torque (Nm)
52 Nm
14.7 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
177 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
202 kg
134 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
47 hp @ 7,250 rpm
19.3 hp @ 10,000 rpm
Torque
52 Nm @ 5,250 rpm
14.7 Nm @ 8,500 rpm
Top Speed
~177 km/h (110 mph, estimated; note: real-world results vary slightly by variant and rider)
approximately 130 km/h
Weight
202 kg (Interceptor 650 wet/curb weight); Continental GT 650 is approximately 198 kg
134 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5–4.0 L/100km (approximately 25–28 km/L typical real-world average)
2.8 L/100km or approximately 35 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Re 650 Twins
8.0/10
"The best used motorcycle under five grand, full stop."
Pros
+Charismatic engine at any price
+Huge aftermarket parts availability
+Relaxed, confidence-inspiring ergonomics
Cons
−Stock suspension underwhelms heavier riders
−Early electrical niggles exist
−Stock tyres need replacing immediately
Yamaha Xsr155
8.0/10
"Best small retro available — just buy a clean, unmolested example."
Pros
+VVA engine genuinely rewarding
+Outstanding build quality
+Bulletproof Yamaha reliability
Cons
−Cramped for taller riders
−Abused examples are common
−Suspension soft when loaded
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
