Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Cfmoto 300nk
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Cfmoto 300nk. Royal Enfield Hunter 350: 20.2 hp @ 6,100 rpm hp, 181 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed ~130 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10. Cfmoto 300nk: ~28 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated) hp, ~165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated, may vary by market tune), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Cfmoto 300nk
Horsepower (hp)
20.2 hp
28 hp
Torque (Nm)
27 Nm
25 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
130 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
181 kg
165 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
20.2 hp @ 6,100 rpm
~28 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated)
Torque
27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
~25 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~130 km/h
~130 km/h (estimated, may vary by market tune)
Weight
181 kg (curb weight)
~165 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Approximately 2.8 L/100km or ~35 km/L (typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28.5 km/L, estimated real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
7.5/10
"A genuinely sorted city bike if bought at the right price."
Pros
+Reliable J-series motor finally
+Excellent urban riding ergonomics
+Strong used value proposition
Cons
−Rust appears embarrassingly quickly
−Replacement panels cost too much
−Highway cruising feels strained
Cfmoto 300nk
7.0/10
"Genuinely capable budget naked that rewards careful used buying."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Sharp modern styling
+Impressive TFT instrumentation
Cons
−Parts supply still patchy
−Early charging system issues
−Resale value uncertain longterm
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
