Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Honda Adv 350
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Honda Adv 350. Royal Enfield Himalayan: 24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm (411cc variant); 40.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (450 variant) hp, 199 kg wet/curb weight (411cc variant); 196 kg (450 variant) weight, top speed 130 km/h (411cc variant, estimated; 450 variant approx. 160 km/h), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Honda Adv 350: 29 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 208 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Himalayan
Honda Adv 350
Horsepower (hp)
24.3 hp
29 hp
Torque (Nm)
32 Nm
31.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
125 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
199 kg
208 kg
Type
Adventure
Adventure
Horsepower
24.3 hp @ 6,500 rpm (411cc variant); 40.0 hp @ 8,000 rpm (450 variant)
29 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
32 Nm @ 4,250 rpm (411cc variant); 40 Nm @ 5,500 rpm (450 variant)
31.5 Nm @ 5,250 rpm
Top Speed
130 km/h (411cc variant, estimated; 450 variant approx. 160 km/h)
125 km/h
Weight
199 kg wet/curb weight (411cc variant); 196 kg (450 variant)
208 kg (curb/wet weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28 km/L, real-world average for 411cc variant)
2.7 L/100km or approximately 37 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Himalayan
7.0/10
"A flawed but loveable gateway drug to adventure riding."
Pros
+Ridiculously easy to ride
+Genuine off-road competence
+Low maintenance running costs
Cons
−Electrical gremlins bite hard
−Fork seals leak frequently
−Sluggish above 65mph
Honda Adv 350
7.8/10
"A genuinely practical urban weapon that won't embarrass you anywhere."
Pros
+Bulletproof Honda reliability record
+Clever underseat helmet storage
+Smooth automatic transmission execution
Cons
−Tiny 8.1-litre fuel tank
−Front suspension feels vague
−Windscreen adjustment nearly useless
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
