Royal Enfield Classic Chrome vs Triumph Speed Twin 900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Classic Chrome vs Triumph Speed Twin 900. Royal Enfield Classic Chrome: 20.1 hp @ 5,100 rpm hp, 195 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed Approximately 120–130 km/h (estimated; note: varies by rider weight and conditions), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Triumph Speed Twin 900: 65 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 216 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Classic Chrome
Triumph Speed Twin 900
Horsepower (hp)
20.1 hp
65 hp
Torque (Nm)
28 Nm
80 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
120 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
195 kg
216 kg
Type
Classic
Classic
Horsepower
20.1 hp @ 5,100 rpm
65 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
28 Nm @ 4,000 rpm
80 Nm @ 3,800 rpm
Top Speed
Approximately 120–130 km/h (estimated; note: varies by rider weight and conditions)
185 km/h (estimated)
Weight
195 kg (wet/curb weight)
216 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Approximately 3.0–3.5 L/100km (28–33 km/L typical real-world average)
4.5 L/100km (approx. 22 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Classic Chrome
6.5/10
"Gorgeous weekend thumper, but inspect thoroughly before committing."
Pros
+Head-turning retro chrome styling
+Bulletproof simple mechanicals
+Relaxed, comfortable riding position
Cons
−Chrome rusts faster than expected
−Vibrates harshly above 65mph
−Early carb models unreliable
Triumph Speed Twin 900
7.8/10
"A characterful, honest middleweight that rewards everyday riders handsomely."
Pros
+Smooth, tractable parallel twin
+Genuinely handsome classic styling
+Comfortable all-day ergonomics
Cons
−Useless stock mirrors
−Early fueling roughness issue
−Switchgear feels budget-grade
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
