Royal Enfield Bear 350 vs Swm Silverback 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Bear 350 vs Swm Silverback 400. Royal Enfield Bear 350: N/A - model not confirmed hp, N/A - model not confirmed weight, top speed N/A - model not confirmed, Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Swm Silverback 400: approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approximately 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Bear 350
Swm Silverback 400
Horsepower (hp)
— hp
35 hp
Torque (Nm)
— Nm
35 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
— km/h
145 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
— kg
165 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
N/A - model not confirmed
approximately 35 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
Torque
N/A - model not confirmed
approximately 35 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
N/A - model not confirmed
approximately 145 km/h (estimated)
Weight
N/A - model not confirmed
approximately 165 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
N/A - model not confirmed
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Bear 350
7.0/10
"A charming, honest beginner-to-intermediate bike that rewards patience over pace."
Pros
+Smooth, refined J-series engine
+Genuinely comfortable riding position
+Strong retro-scrambler aesthetic
Cons
−Sluggish above 80mph
−Patchy parts availability
−Early electrical reliability concerns
Swm Silverback 400
6.5/10
"Capable niche adventurer ruined by catastrophic parts and dealer support."
Pros
+Proven Rotax-derived engine
+Capable off-road geometry
+Priced well below competitors
Cons
−Near-zero parts availability
−Negligible dealer support network
−Resale value stays low
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
