Royal Enfield Bear 350 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 701
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Royal Enfield Bear 350 vs Husqvarna Svartpilen 701. Royal Enfield Bear 350: N/A - model not confirmed hp, N/A - model not confirmed weight, top speed N/A - model not confirmed, Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Husqvarna Svartpilen 701: 74 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 157 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Royal Enfield Bear 350
Husqvarna Svartpilen 701
Horsepower (hp)
— hp
74 hp
Torque (Nm)
— Nm
72 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
— km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
— kg
157 kg
Type
Scrambler
Scrambler
Horsepower
N/A - model not confirmed
74 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
N/A - model not confirmed
72 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
N/A - model not confirmed
175 km/h
Weight
N/A - model not confirmed
157 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
N/A - model not confirmed
4.5–5.5 L/100km (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Royal Enfield Bear 350
7.0/10
"A charming, honest beginner-to-intermediate bike that rewards patience over pace."
Pros
+Smooth, refined J-series engine
+Genuinely comfortable riding position
+Strong retro-scrambler aesthetic
Cons
−Sluggish above 80mph
−Patchy parts availability
−Early electrical reliability concerns
Husqvarna Svartpilen 701
7.8/10
"A flawed but genuinely exciting single that rewards committed riders."
Pros
+Punchy LC4 engine character
+Genuinely distinctive styling
+Capable WP suspension
Cons
−Tiny 4.5-litre tank
−Expensive service intervals
−Early fuel pump issues
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
