Qj Motor Srk 600 vs Qj Motor Srk 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Srk 600 vs Qj Motor Srk 400. Qj Motor Srk 600: 80 hp @ 11,000 rpm hp, 208 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 180 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Srk 600
Qj Motor Srk 400
Horsepower (hp)
80 hp
42 hp
Torque (Nm)
54 Nm
37 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
180 km/h
160 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
208 kg
189 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
80 hp @ 11,000 rpm
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Torque
54 Nm @ 8,500 rpm
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Top Speed
180 km/h (estimated)
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
Weight
208 kg (wet/curb weight)
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Srk 600
6.5/10
"A cheap bet on a brand still earning its reputation."
Pros
+Smooth, capable parallel-twin
+Strong value at used prices
+Comfortable ergonomics all day
Cons
−Parts availability genuinely poor
−Thin dealer/service network
−Switchgear feels budget-grade
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
