Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Kawasaki Ninja 650
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Qj Motor Srk 400 vs Kawasaki Ninja 650. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Kawasaki Ninja 650: 67 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 193 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 195 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Qj Motor Srk 400
Kawasaki Ninja 650
Horsepower (hp)
42 hp
67 hp
Torque (Nm)
37 Nm
65.7 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
195 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
189 kg
193 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
67 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
65.7 Nm @ 6,700 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
195 km/h
Weight
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
193 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
5.5 L/100km (approximately 18 km/L real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Kawasaki Ninja 650
8.2/10
"The smartest used middleweight money can buy, full stop."
Pros
+Bulletproof parallel twin engine
+Cheap parts and servicing
+Forgiving ergonomics suit most
Cons
−Soft suspension ages poorly
−Neglected chains are common
−Fairing damage from droppers
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
