Loncin Cr6 300 vs Qj Motor Srk 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Loncin Cr6 300 vs Qj Motor Srk 400. Loncin Cr6 300: ~25 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, ~175 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Loncin Cr6 300
Qj Motor Srk 400
Horsepower (hp)
25 hp
42 hp
Torque (Nm)
26 Nm
37 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
160 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
175 kg
189 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
~25 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Torque
~26 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated)
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
Weight
~175 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or approximately 28.5 km/L (estimated real-world average)
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Loncin Cr6 300
6.5/10
"Decent budget middleweight if you buy carefully and inspect thoroughly."
Pros
+Surprisingly capable chassis
+Affordable entry price point
+Decent fuel economy
Cons
−Electrical gremlins on older examples
−Variable factory quality control
−Resale value drops sharply
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
