Lifan Lf200-10s vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Lifan Lf200-10s vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900. Lifan Lf200-10s: ~13 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated) hp, ~115 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~110 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 4.5/10. Kawasaki Vulcan 900: 50 hp @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish output figures for this model) hp, 272 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated; note: governed more by wind resistance than engine limits), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Lifan Lf200-10s
Kawasaki Vulcan 900
Horsepower (hp)
13 hp
50 hp
Torque (Nm)
14 Nm
76 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
110 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
115 kg
272 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
~13 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated)
50 hp @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish output figures for this model)
Torque
~14 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
76 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Top Speed
~110 km/h (estimated)
175 km/h (estimated; note: governed more by wind resistance than engine limits)
Weight
~115 kg (wet/curb weight)
272 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.5 L/100km or ~40 km/L (estimated real-world average)
5.2 L/100km (approx. 19.2 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Lifan Lf200-10s
4.5/10
"Acceptable beginner bike if expectations are ruthlessly managed from day one."
Pros
+Extremely affordable entry price
+Easy low-speed maneuverability
+Decent cruiser styling
Cons
−Electrical gremlins plague used examples
−Highway use not recommended
−Parts sourcing can frustrate
Kawasaki Vulcan 900
7.5/10
"Dependable, honest cruiser that punches above its used asking price."
Pros
+Near-indestructible engine reliability
+Comfortable upright riding position
+Affordable used market pricing
Cons
−Wallowy at highway speeds
−Stock seat punishes long rides
−Chrome quality disappoints over time
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
