Kymco K-pipe 125 vs Suzuki Gn 125
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco K-pipe 125 vs Suzuki Gn 125. Kymco K-pipe 125: 9.7 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated; official figures vary by market) hp, 118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 95 km/h (estimated, note: some sources suggest up to 100 km/h), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Suzuki Gn 125: 11 hp @ 9,000 rpm hp, 105 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 105 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco K-pipe 125
Suzuki Gn 125
Horsepower (hp)
9.7 hp
11 hp
Torque (Nm)
9.5 Nm
9.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
95 km/h
105 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
105 kg
Type
Commuter
Commuter
Horsepower
9.7 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated; official figures vary by market)
11 hp @ 9,000 rpm
Torque
9.5 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
9.5 Nm @ 7,500 rpm
Top Speed
95 km/h (estimated, note: some sources suggest up to 100 km/h)
105 km/h
Weight
118 kg (wet/curb weight)
105 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
2.5 L/100km or approximately 40 km/L (estimated real-world average)
2.5 L/100km (approx. 40 km/L)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Kymco K-pipe 125
7.0/10
"Cheap urban fun that rewards buyers who inspect carefully first."
Pros
+Genuinely tough little engine
+Brilliant urban maneuverability
+Strong used value retention
Cons
−Breathless above 60mph
−Neglected examples everywhere
−Cheap switchgear and plastics
Suzuki Gn 125
7.0/10
"The ultimate urban commuter for riders who value reliability above everything else."
Pros
+Near-indestructible engine reliability
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Cheap parts everywhere
Cons
−Embarrassingly slow on highways
−Agricultural suspension quality
−Often badly abused used
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
