Kymco Exciter 150 vs Cfmoto 150nk
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco Exciter 150 vs Cfmoto 150nk. Kymco Exciter 150: ~13.5 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Cfmoto 150nk: 12.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, note: official figures vary slightly by market) hp, 138 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 110 km/h (estimated, note: may vary by market variant), Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco Exciter 150
Cfmoto 150nk
Horsepower (hp)
13.5 hp
12.5 hp
Torque (Nm)
13.2 Nm
12.5 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
110 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
138 kg
Type
Naked
Naked
Horsepower
~13.5 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
12.5 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, note: official figures vary slightly by market)
Torque
~13.2 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
12.5 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated)
110 km/h (estimated, note: may vary by market variant)
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
138 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.5 L/100km or ~40 km/L (typical real-world average)
2.8 L/100km or approximately 35 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Kymco Exciter 150
6.5/10
"Honest budget commuter that earns its keep without pretending otherwise."
Pros
+Genuinely reliable engine
+Cheap parts availability
+Fuel sipping economy
Cons
−Fork seals fail early
−Brakes inspire zero confidence
−Neglected by most owners
Cfmoto 150nk
6.5/10
"Solid urban commuter if the service history checks out completely."
Pros
+Surprisingly solid build quality
+Excellent urban fuel economy
+Clean modern styling
Cons
−Vague, wallowing suspension
−Punishes maintenance neglect badly
−Limited highway capability
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
