Kymco Cv3 vs Yamaha Nmax 155
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco Cv3 vs Yamaha Nmax 155. Kymco Cv3: ~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released) hp, ~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed) weight, top speed ~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production), Motoryk rating 6.8/10. Yamaha Nmax 155: 15.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 127 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 125 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco Cv3
Yamaha Nmax 155
Horsepower (hp)
60 hp
15.1 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
13.9 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
180 km/h
125 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
280 kg
127 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released)
15.1 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; official specs not fully released)
13.9 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production)
125 km/h
Weight
~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed)
127 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~5.0 L/100km (estimated, based on engine class; official figures not published for production model)
2.4 L/100km or approximately 41 km/L (typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Kymco Cv3
6.8/10
"A clever used bargain if the front suspension checks out clean."
Pros
+Leaning front end genuinely works
+Strong new-price depreciation
+Practical all-weather commuter
Cons
−Thin parts and dealer network
−Front suspension inspection critical
−Styling divides opinion sharply
Yamaha Nmax 155
7.8/10
"A smart, reliable urban weapon if you buy carefully."
Pros
+Bulletproof Blue Core engine
+Excellent underseat storage
+Composed, planted handling
Cons
−Front forks leak when neglected
−Plastics scratch embarrassingly easily
−Pillion comfort is mediocre
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
