Kymco Cv3 vs Piaggio Mp3 300
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Kymco Cv3 vs Piaggio Mp3 300. Kymco Cv3: ~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released) hp, ~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed) weight, top speed ~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production), Motoryk rating 6.8/10. Piaggio Mp3 300: 22 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 230 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 135 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Kymco Cv3
Piaggio Mp3 300
Horsepower (hp)
60 hp
22 hp
Torque (Nm)
55 Nm
24 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
180 km/h
135 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
280 kg
230 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released)
22 hp @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
~55 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; official specs not fully released)
24 Nm @ 5,000 rpm
Top Speed
~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production)
135 km/h
Weight
~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed)
230 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~5.0 L/100km (estimated, based on engine class; official figures not published for production model)
3.8 L/100km (approx. 26 km/L, real-world estimate)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Kymco Cv3
6.8/10
"A clever used bargain if the front suspension checks out clean."
Pros
+Leaning front end genuinely works
+Strong new-price depreciation
+Practical all-weather commuter
Cons
−Thin parts and dealer network
−Front suspension inspection critical
−Styling divides opinion sharply
Piaggio Mp3 300
7.5/10
"The commuter scooter that genuinely earns its strange premium."
Pros
+Exceptional low-speed stability
+Genuinely all-weather capable
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Hydraulic lock failures expensive
−Heavy for a scooter
−Neglected service histories common
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
