Ktm Adventure 390 X vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ktm Adventure 390 X vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 450. Ktm Adventure 390 X: 43 hp @ 9,000 rpm hp, 179 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 167 km/h (estimated, note: off-road gearing may slightly reduce top speed vs standard 390 Adventure), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Royal Enfield Himalayan 450: 40 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 196 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed approx. 170 km/h (estimated; Royal Enfield does not officially publish top speed), Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ktm Adventure 390 X
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
Horsepower (hp)
43 hp
40 hp
Torque (Nm)
37 Nm
40 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
167 km/h
— km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
179 kg
196 kg
Type
Adventure
Adventure
Horsepower
43 hp @ 9,000 rpm
40 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
37 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
40 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
167 km/h (estimated, note: off-road gearing may slightly reduce top speed vs standard 390 Adventure)
approx. 170 km/h (estimated; Royal Enfield does not officially publish top speed)
Weight
179 kg (wet/curb weight)
196 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.5 L/100km or ~28.5 km/L (typical real-world average)
approx. 3.5–4.0 L/100km (25–28 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Ktm Adventure 390 X
7.8/10
"A serious small-ADV bargain, if you find a maintained one."
Pros
+Capable suspension for the money
+Punchy, reliable single-cylinder
+Proper spoke wheels fitted
Cons
−Tall seat height punishes shorties
−Tight service intervals cost money
−Vibration tiring on highways
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
7.8/10
"The best Himalayan yet, and used prices make it irresistible."
Pros
+Sherpa engine genuinely impressive
+Capable suspension, no complaints
+Useful TFT navigation system
Cons
−Early software bugs persist
−Cramped for taller riders
−Parts availability still patchy
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
