Husqvarna Fe 350 vs Yamaha Wr 250 F
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Husqvarna Fe 350 vs Yamaha Wr 250 F. Husqvarna Fe 350: ~45 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated) hp, 103 kg (wet/curb weight, approximate) weight, top speed ~145 km/h (estimated; off-road gearing limits top speed), Motoryk rating 8.5/10. Yamaha Wr 250 F: 36 hp @ 12,500 rpm (estimated for post-2015 fuel-injected models) hp, 118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 135 km/h (estimated; note: varies by gearing and conditions), Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Husqvarna Fe 350
Yamaha Wr 250 F
Horsepower (hp)
45 hp
36 hp
Torque (Nm)
38 Nm
24 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
135 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
103 kg
118 kg
Type
Enduro
Enduro
Horsepower
~45 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated)
36 hp @ 12,500 rpm (estimated for post-2015 fuel-injected models)
Torque
~38 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
24 Nm @ 10,000 rpm (estimated)
Top Speed
~145 km/h (estimated; off-road gearing limits top speed)
135 km/h (estimated; note: varies by gearing and conditions)
Weight
103 kg (wet/curb weight, approximate)
118 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~4.5 L/100km (estimated real-world; varies greatly with terrain and riding style)
3.5 L/100km (approximately 28.5 km/L) — estimated, varies greatly with riding conditions
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Husqvarna Fe 350
8.5/10
"Best all-round used enduro if you buy smart and verify history."
Pros
+Effortless power delivery
+Excellent suspension quality
+Lightweight and flickable
Cons
−Expensive maintenance intervals
−Worn linkage bearings common
−Fuel range embarrassingly short
Yamaha Wr 250 F
8.5/10
"A serious trail weapon that rewards diligent buyers who do their homework."
Pros
+Race-derived engine, brilliant power
+Lightweight and highly flickable
+Bulletproof Yamaha reliability maintained
Cons
−Valves neglected by most owners
−Suspension bearings routinely ignored
−Street legal kit is minimal
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
