Honda Dream Neo vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Honda Dream Neo vs Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub. Honda Dream Neo: 8.36 hp @ 7,500 rpm hp, 102 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed 90 km/h (estimated real-world; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub: 8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm hp, 118 kg (curb/wet weight) weight, top speed Approximately 95–100 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Honda Dream Neo
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
Horsepower (hp)
8.36 hp
8.8 hp
Torque (Nm)
8.05 Nm
11 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
90 km/h
95 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
102 kg
118 kg
Type
Commuter
Commuter
Horsepower
8.36 hp @ 7,500 rpm
8.8 hp (6.5 kW) @ 7,500 rpm
Torque
8.05 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
11 Nm @ 5,000 rpm
Top Speed
90 km/h (estimated real-world; manufacturer does not officially publish top speed)
Approximately 95–100 km/h
Weight
102 kg (curb/wet weight)
118 kg (curb/wet weight)
Fuel
60–65 km/L (approximately 1.54–1.67 L/100km, manufacturer claimed; real-world ~55–60 km/L)
Approximately 1.8–2.2 L/100km (45–55 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Honda Dream Neo
6.5/10
"Sensible urban workhorse, but ambition ends at city limits."
Pros
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Dirt-cheap maintenance costs
+Bulletproof engine reliability
Cons
−Gutless above 70km/h
−Drum brakes feel dated
−Zero highway confidence
Honda Ct125 Hunter Cub
7.8/10
"Brilliant urban runabout that's overpriced but worth every penny."
Pros
+Exceptional fuel economy
+Legendary Honda reliability
+Upright comfortable ergonomics
Cons
−Underpowered on faster roads
−Suspension too soft overall
−Overpriced used market currently
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
