Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle vs Kawasaki Vulcan 900. Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle: 122 hp @ 8,250 rpm hp, 295 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 210 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.5/10. Kawasaki Vulcan 900: 50 hp @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish output figures for this model) hp, 272 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimated; note: governed more by wind resistance than engine limits), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle
Kawasaki Vulcan 900
Horsepower (hp)
122 hp
50 hp
Torque (Nm)
115 Nm
76 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
210 km/h
175 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
295 kg
272 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
122 hp @ 8,250 rpm
50 hp @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; Kawasaki does not officially publish output figures for this model)
Torque
115 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
76 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Top Speed
210 km/h
175 km/h (estimated; note: governed more by wind resistance than engine limits)
Weight
295 kg (wet/curb weight)
272 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
8.0 L/100km (approx. 12.5 km/L, typical real-world average)
5.2 L/100km (approx. 19.2 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle
8.5/10
"The best performance Harley ever built, criminally undervalued used."
Pros
+Porsche-engineered engine screams
+Handles surprisingly well
+Liquid-cooled reliability advantage
Cons
−Expensive rear tire replacement
−Uncomfortable for tall riders
−Heavy at low speeds
Kawasaki Vulcan 900
7.5/10
"Dependable, honest cruiser that punches above its used asking price."
Pros
+Near-indestructible engine reliability
+Comfortable upright riding position
+Affordable used market pricing
Cons
−Wallowy at highway speeds
−Stock seat punishes long rides
−Chrome quality disappoints over time
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
