Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle vs Harley-davidson V-rod
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle vs Harley-davidson V-rod. Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle: 122 hp @ 8,250 rpm hp, 295 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 210 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.5/10. Harley-davidson V-rod: 122 hp @ 8,250 rpm (2012+ V-Rod Muscle; original 2002 model produced ~115 hp) hp, 295 kg (wet/curb weight — V-Rod Muscle variant) weight, top speed 225 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle
Harley-davidson V-rod
Horsepower (hp)
122 hp
122 hp
Torque (Nm)
115 Nm
116 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
210 km/h
225 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
295 kg
295 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
122 hp @ 8,250 rpm
122 hp @ 8,250 rpm (2012+ V-Rod Muscle; original 2002 model produced ~115 hp)
Torque
115 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
116 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
Top Speed
210 km/h
225 km/h
Weight
295 kg (wet/curb weight)
295 kg (wet/curb weight — V-Rod Muscle variant)
Fuel
8.0 L/100km (approx. 12.5 km/L, typical real-world average)
7.5 L/100km (approximately 13.3 km/L) — estimated real-world average
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Vrscf V-rod Muscle
8.5/10
"The best performance Harley ever built, criminally undervalued used."
Pros
+Porsche-engineered engine screams
+Handles surprisingly well
+Liquid-cooled reliability advantage
Cons
−Expensive rear tire replacement
−Uncomfortable for tall riders
−Heavy at low speeds
Harley-davidson V-rod
7.5/10
"A genuinely capable cruiser that rewards riders who do their homework."
Pros
+Porsche-developed engine is exceptional
+Genuinely strong top-end power
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Parts increasingly hard to find
−Heavy and awkward parking lot
−Specialist servicing costs hurt
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
