Harley-davidson Low Rider St vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Low Rider St vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114. Harley-davidson Low Rider St: 93 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 358 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.2/10. Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114: 93 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Low Rider St
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Horsepower (hp)
93 hp
93 hp
Torque (Nm)
166 Nm
155 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
358 kg
303 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
Torque
166 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
155 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated)
185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures)
Weight
358 kg (curb weight)
303 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
6.5 L/100km (approximately 15.4 km/L, typical real-world average)
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Low Rider St
8.2/10
"The best all-rounder Harley has built in decades."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight 117 pulls hard
+Semi-active suspension genuinely capable
+Commanding, confidence-inspiring ergonomics
Cons
−Rear passenger comfort is poor
−Headers bluing on early examples
−Limited luggage without accessories
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
7.5/10
"Raw, characterful muscle bike that rewards riders who respect its limitations."
Pros
+114ci torque is addictive
+Genuinely aggressive street presence
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Stock seat is brutal
−Firm suspension punishes commuters
−Early models had oil seeping
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
