Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Low Rider St
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Low Rider St. Harley-davidson Low Rider 107: 86 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Harley-davidson Low Rider St: 93 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 358 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.2/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
Harley-davidson Low Rider St
Horsepower (hp)
86 hp
93 hp
Torque (Nm)
145 Nm
166 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
303 kg
358 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
86 hp @ 5,020 rpm
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
Torque
145 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
166 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated)
185 km/h (estimated)
Weight
303 kg (curb weight)
358 kg (curb weight)
Fuel
5.8 L/100km (approx. 17.2 km/L) — estimated real-world average
6.5 L/100km (approximately 15.4 km/L, typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
7.8/10
"A proper cruiser that actually rides as good as it looks."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight torque is addictive
+Surprisingly competent cornering ability
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Stock seat is genuinely terrible
−Exhaust heat cooks right leg
−Fork seal issues on earlies
Harley-davidson Low Rider St
8.2/10
"The best all-rounder Harley has built in decades."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight 117 pulls hard
+Semi-active suspension genuinely capable
+Commanding, confidence-inspiring ergonomics
Cons
−Rear passenger comfort is poor
−Headers bluing on early examples
−Limited luggage without accessories
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
