Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Forty-eight
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Forty-eight. Harley-davidson Low Rider 107: 86 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Harley-davidson Forty-eight: 60 hp @ 6,000 rpm hp, 253 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 170 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
Harley-davidson Forty-eight
Horsepower (hp)
86 hp
60 hp
Torque (Nm)
145 Nm
97 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
170 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
303 kg
253 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
86 hp @ 5,020 rpm
60 hp @ 6,000 rpm
Torque
145 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
97 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated)
170 km/h
Weight
303 kg (curb weight)
253 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.8 L/100km (approx. 17.2 km/L) — estimated real-world average
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
7.8/10
"A proper cruiser that actually rides as good as it looks."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight torque is addictive
+Surprisingly competent cornering ability
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Stock seat is genuinely terrible
−Exhaust heat cooks right leg
−Fork seal issues on earlies
Harley-davidson Forty-eight
7.5/10
"A charismatic city scramblers that demands realistic expectations about range and comfort."
Pros
+Bulletproof Sportster engine reliability
+Parts availability everywhere
+Genuinely stunning visual presence
Cons
−Tiny tank, terrible range
−Seat punishes longer rides
−Many dropped examples exist
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
