Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107 vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114. Harley-davidson Low Rider 107: 86 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114: 93 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Horsepower (hp)
86 hp
93 hp
Torque (Nm)
145 Nm
155 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
303 kg
303 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
86 hp @ 5,020 rpm
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
Torque
145 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
155 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated)
185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures)
Weight
303 kg (curb weight)
303 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.8 L/100km (approx. 17.2 km/L) — estimated real-world average
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Low Rider 107
7.8/10
"A proper cruiser that actually rides as good as it looks."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight torque is addictive
+Surprisingly competent cornering ability
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Stock seat is genuinely terrible
−Exhaust heat cooks right leg
−Fork seal issues on earlies
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
7.5/10
"Raw, characterful muscle bike that rewards riders who respect its limitations."
Pros
+114ci torque is addictive
+Genuinely aggressive street presence
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Stock seat is brutal
−Firm suspension punishes commuters
−Early models had oil seeping
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
