Harley-davidson Fat Bob vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Fat Bob
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Horsepower (hp)
93 hp
93 hp
Torque (Nm)
145 Nm
155 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
303 kg
303 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm (2018+ Milwaukee-Eight 107; note: Harley rates in torque primarily, hp is an estimate)
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
Torque
145 Nm @ 3,000 rpm (2018+ Milwaukee-Eight 107)
155 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated, note: varies by year and engine variant)
185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures)
Weight
303 kg (wet/curb weight, 2018+ Softail-based model)
303 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L, real-world estimate for 2018+ model)
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Fat Bob
7.8/10
"The Fat Bob rewards riders who want character over compromise."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight 114 pulls hard
+Handles better than expected
+Distinctive aggressive street presence
Cons
−Heavy at low speed maneuvers
−107 version underpowered highway
−Cam tensioner issues pre-2020
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
7.5/10
"Raw, characterful muscle bike that rewards riders who respect its limitations."
Pros
+114ci torque is addictive
+Genuinely aggressive street presence
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Stock seat is brutal
−Firm suspension punishes commuters
−Early models had oil seeping
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
