Harley-davidson Fat Bob vs Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Fat Bob
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
Horsepower (hp)
93 hp
68 hp
Torque (Nm)
145 Nm
112 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
185 km/h
185 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
303 kg
305 kg
Type
Cruiser
Cruiser
Horsepower
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm (2018+ Milwaukee-Eight 107; note: Harley rates in torque primarily, hp is an estimate)
68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (note: estimated for 96ci Twin Cam; 103ci variant approx. 73 hp)
Torque
145 Nm @ 3,000 rpm (2018+ Milwaukee-Eight 107)
112 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96; 103ci approx. 119 Nm)
Top Speed
185 km/h (estimated, note: varies by year and engine variant)
185 km/h
Weight
303 kg (wet/curb weight, 2018+ Softail-based model)
305 kg (wet/curb weight, 2008-2017 Dyna FXDF)
Fuel
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L, real-world estimate for 2018+ model)
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L, real-world average for 2008-2017 Dyna Fat Bob)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Fat Bob
7.8/10
"The Fat Bob rewards riders who want character over compromise."
Pros
+Milwaukee-Eight 114 pulls hard
+Handles better than expected
+Distinctive aggressive street presence
Cons
−Heavy at low speed maneuvers
−107 version underpowered highway
−Cam tensioner issues pre-2020
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
7.8/10
"Raw, honest American muscle that rewards careful used-buying diligence."
Pros
+Bulletproof Twin Cam reliability
+Genuinely aggressive visual presence
+Responsive handling for its class
Cons
−Cam tensioners need early inspection
−Rear isolator mounts crack silently
−Motorway cruising vibration tiring
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
