Harley-davidson Dyna Wide Glide vs Harley-davidson Wide Glide
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Dyna Wide Glide vs Harley-davidson Wide Glide. Harley-davidson Dyna Wide Glide: 68 hp @ 5,500 rpm hp, 304 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 175 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Harley-davidson Wide Glide: 68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96B, later models; note: earlier Evo-era models produced approx. 55–60 hp) hp, 317 kg (wet/curb weight — based on 2010–2017 FXDWG Dyna Wide Glide) weight, top speed 175 km/h (estimate; varies by year and engine spec), Motoryk rating 7.3/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Dyna Wide Glide
Harley-davidson Wide Glide
Weight (kg) — lower is better
Horsepower
68 hp @ 5,500 rpm
68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96B, later models; note: earlier Evo-era models produced approx. 55–60 hp)
Torque
113 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
113 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96B; estimate for later Dyna-era models)
Top Speed
175 km/h
175 km/h (estimate; varies by year and engine spec)
Weight
304 kg (wet/curb weight)
317 kg (wet/curb weight — based on 2010–2017 FXDWG Dyna Wide Glide)
Fuel
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L)
6.7 L/100km (approx. 15 km/L) — estimate based on typical Twin Cam 96/103 real-world usage
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Dyna Wide Glide
7.8/10
"A proper bagger-adjacent cruiser that rewards riders over posers."
Pros
+Genuinely distinctive chopper styling
+Twin Cam pulls hard everywhere
+Surprisingly capable handling
Cons
−Primary chain wears quickly
−Stock seat punishes long days
−Front isolators crack with age
Harley-davidson Wide Glide
7.3/10
"A style-first cruiser that rewards riders who know exactly what they want."
Pros
+Iconic factory custom styling
+Twin Cam bulletproof reliability
+Strong resale value retention
Cons
−Zero wind protection
−Wallows hard in corners
−Vibration fatigue on highways
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
Affiliate · we may earn
