Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob vs Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114. Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob: 68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (note: estimated for 96ci Twin Cam; 103ci variant approx. 73 hp) hp, 305 kg (wet/curb weight, 2008-2017 Dyna FXDF) weight, top speed 185 km/h, Motoryk rating 7.8/10. Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114: 93 hp @ 5,020 rpm hp, 303 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures), Motoryk rating 7.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
Weight (kg) — lower is better
Horsepower
68 hp @ 5,500 rpm (note: estimated for 96ci Twin Cam; 103ci variant approx. 73 hp)
93 hp @ 5,020 rpm
Torque
112 Nm @ 3,500 rpm (Twin Cam 96; 103ci approx. 119 Nm)
155 Nm @ 3,000 rpm
Top Speed
185 km/h
185 km/h (estimated; note: Harley-Davidson does not officially publish top speed figures)
Weight
305 kg (wet/curb weight, 2008-2017 Dyna FXDF)
303 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (approx. 18 km/L, real-world average for 2008-2017 Dyna Fat Bob)
6.5 L/100km (approx. 15.4 km/L typical real-world average)
Individual Reviews
Harley-davidson Dyna Fat Bob
7.8/10
"Raw, honest American muscle that rewards careful used-buying diligence."
Pros
+Bulletproof Twin Cam reliability
+Genuinely aggressive visual presence
+Responsive handling for its class
Cons
−Cam tensioners need early inspection
−Rear isolator mounts crack silently
−Motorway cruising vibration tiring
Harley-davidson Fat Bob 114
7.5/10
"Raw, characterful muscle bike that rewards riders who respect its limitations."
Pros
+114ci torque is addictive
+Genuinely aggressive street presence
+Handles better than expected
Cons
−Stock seat is brutal
−Firm suspension punishes commuters
−Early models had oil seeping
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
Affiliate · we may earn
