Haojue Rx3 Sport vs Qj Motor Srk 400
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Haojue Rx3 Sport vs Qj Motor Srk 400. Haojue Rx3 Sport: ~15 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated) hp, ~145 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated) weight, top speed ~130 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 6.5/10. Qj Motor Srk 400: ~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data) hp, ~189 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed), Motoryk rating 7.0/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Haojue Rx3 Sport
Qj Motor Srk 400
Horsepower (hp)
15 hp
42 hp
Torque (Nm)
13 Nm
37 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
130 km/h
160 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
145 kg
189 kg
Type
Sport
Sport
Horsepower
~15 hp @ 9,000 rpm (estimated)
~42 hp @ 9,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Torque
~13 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated)
~37 Nm @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on available market data)
Top Speed
~130 km/h (estimated)
~160 km/h (estimated; note: official figure not widely confirmed)
Weight
~145 kg (wet/curb weight, estimated)
~189 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~2.8 L/100km or ~35 km/L (estimated real-world average)
Estimated 4.0–5.0 L/100km (note: based on comparable 400cc parallel-twin models; official QJ Motor figures may vary slightly)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Haojue Rx3 Sport
6.5/10
"Honest budget transport that rewards patient, mechanically-minded buyers willing to wrench."
Pros
+Smooth twin engine surprisingly capable
+Exceptional value for money
+Fuel economy genuinely impressive
Cons
−Electrical reliability a real concern
−Plastics fit often inconsistent
−Limited dealer network support
Qj Motor Srk 400
7.0/10
"Solid budget-friendly naked if you buy a well-maintained example."
Pros
+Strong value for money
+Comfortable upright ergonomics
+Smooth low-rev torque
Cons
−Radiator hose chafing issue
−Electrical gremlins on neglected bikes
−Uninspiring top-end character
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
