Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Suzuki Drz400sm
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Suzuki Drz400sm. Ccm Flat Tracker 450: ~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Suzuki Drz400sm: 40 hp @ 8,000 rpm hp, 148 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 155 km/h, Motoryk rating 8.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
Suzuki Drz400sm
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
40 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
39 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
155 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
148 kg
Type
Supermoto
Supermoto
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine)
40 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
~40 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
39 Nm @ 6,500 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
155 km/h
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
148 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km (approx. 28 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
8.0/10
"A thrilling boutique tracker that demands an attentive, committed owner."
Pros
+Genuinely exotic British provenance
+Suspension properly sorted from factory
+Lightweight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Parts sourcing occasionally frustrating
−Aggressive power needs respect
−Subframe cracks on abused examples
Suzuki Drz400sm
8.5/10
"The ultimate urban weapon if you buy one with documented maintenance."
Pros
+Virtually indestructible engine
+Incredible urban flickability
+Simple cheap maintenance
Cons
−Neglected valves are common
−Harsh stock suspension
−Motorway cruising is miserable
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
