Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Bmw G 450 X
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Ccm Flat Tracker 450 vs Bmw G 450 X. Ccm Flat Tracker 450: ~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine) hp, ~118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed ~160 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 8.0/10. Bmw G 450 X: 52 hp @ 9,000 rpm hp, 118 kg (wet/curb weight) weight, top speed 160 km/h, Motoryk rating 6.5/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
Bmw G 450 X
Horsepower (hp)
40 hp
52 hp
Torque (Nm)
40 Nm
43 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
160 km/h
160 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
118 kg
118 kg
Type
Supermoto
Supermoto
Horsepower
~40 hp @ 8,000 rpm (estimated, based on Suzuki DR-Z450-derived engine)
52 hp @ 9,000 rpm
Torque
~40 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
43 Nm @ 7,000 rpm
Top Speed
~160 km/h (estimated)
160 km/h
Weight
~118 kg (wet/curb weight)
118 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
~3.5 L/100km or ~28 km/L (estimated typical real-world average)
3.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
Fairing
No
No
Individual Reviews
Ccm Flat Tracker 450
8.0/10
"A thrilling boutique tracker that demands an attentive, committed owner."
Pros
+Genuinely exotic British provenance
+Suspension properly sorted from factory
+Lightweight and supremely flickable
Cons
−Parts sourcing occasionally frustrating
−Aggressive power needs respect
−Subframe cracks on abused examples
Bmw G 450 X
6.5/10
"Rewarding but high-maintenance — buy cheap or walk away."
Pros
+Razor-sharp supermoto handling
+Exotic BMW ownership experience
+Strong power-to-weight ratio
Cons
−Parts availability genuinely terrible
−Notorious 4k rpm flat spot
−Runs excessively hot
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
